5 Comments
Feb 9, 2023Liked by Michael Pershan

Thanks for this. Makes me wonder why they don't cite what (I think) is pretty good evidence for the effectiveness productive struggle (in particular contexts and when done in particular ways). There's some really clear and well documented examples, I know off the top of my head, mostly

Inventing to Prepare for Future Learning Stuff, like

https://aaalab.stanford.edu/papers/CI2202pp129-184.pdf

https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Fa0025140

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11251-016-9374-0

https://journals.aps.org/prper/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010128

It just seems like there is such a large and varied body of evidence one could point to. It's interesting that they choose not to point to it, or don't consider it the kind of studies that are important o point to. Or? Surely, there's got to be more than what I can just recall from memory.

Expand full comment
Feb 9, 2023Liked by Michael Pershan

Not gonna lie. This made me almost tear up. Really nice analysis.

Expand full comment

This is a truly useful analysis! "Research shows" gets thrown around so haphazardly these days that I really appreciate that you've drilled down on those claims in this example. Many will say things like "teachers need to be teaching with pedagogy supported by current research." And I agree! But the rub is that, as you've made so clear in this piece, a lot of what's cited as supporting evidence is in fact not evidence at all. That problem only gets compounded by the lack of replication in ed research and ideologically driven researchers. It makes it hard for the average teacher to sort out who to believe. I think that leads them to lean very hard on intuition (which probably isn't the worst thing - but certainly could be wrong).

This also made me think of the new California math standards, especially the "evidence" around de-tracking. I wrote about that, in case anyone is interested: Jo Boaler, Tracking, Education Research, and Honesty

https://medium.com/@z_cress/jo-boaler-tracking-education-research-and-honesty-7828c685e541

Expand full comment

I am a little more practical, I don't care if studies show that students learn more or less from "productive struggle" - (is that biased by calling it productive?) Students are so diverse, like humans who are students - not one method would be the best for all, but maybe it would be best for the majority??? I have learned more from struggle, but not so sure if left to struggle, more than I did, what the results would be. Many times I learn more from answers, but the question is do the students want to learn and flourish, or just get by, complete the homework- so they can go talk/whatever with their friends. Maybe we should just teach curiosity, to never stop questioning,...

Expand full comment